In the outside world, many things remain frustratingly dark. The Republican primaries have been one long echo of our savaged past, with its hypermasculinities, bigotry, and reactionary irrationalism. On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders may rightfully have criticised the influence of money in politics and advocated many worthwhile reforms, from criminal justice to universal healthcare. Yet his narrow-minded isolationism, protectionism, and broken climate policies (for more on that, Ted Nordhaus has just published an excellent op-ed) are all worrying signs at a time when the world needs integration and solidarity more than ever.
In other news, today marks five years since the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami. At the time, Anna and I were living in Hong Kong, and I remember that we were just about to board a flight to Vietnam for the weekend when the news broke of the 9.0 megathrust earthquake. Yet, despite the fact that the earthquake and tsunami killed more than 15,000 people, the world’s attention soon shifted almost entirely to the nuclear disaster unfolding at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. Even though that accident has not caused any direct deaths, many took it as evidence that nuclear power was inherently unsafe.
Rereading my own posts here on Rawls & Me, I have to admit that I too was swept along by the anti-nuclear hysteria that followed. Yet, in retrospect, I think that, more than anything, it was precisely the Fukushima accident that made me so strongly pro-nuclear. After all, if a technology can withstand one of the most powerful earthquakes in recorded history, followed by a 13-metre tsunami and numerous aftershocks, without causing any fatalities (despite a deeply flawed safety culture), then that should surely count among its merits. This is especially so when considering the hundreds of thousands who die from fossil energy each year, or the fact that an exclusive reliance on renewable energy would condemn much of the world’s population to chronic poverty.